The Soviet Military Awards Page Forum  
  • Serial Numbers Database 2.0
Enter Here

vBClassified Featured Listings
Seeking following Soviet campaign medals for ..,
Echoes of War
Echoes of War

Go Back   The Soviet Military Awards Page Forum > Soviet Awards Forums > General And Slightly Off Topic Talk > General Talk Archive

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2005, 07:06 AM   #1
Esteban_cool
Senior Member
 
Esteban_cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Santiago, Chile
Age: 36
Posts: 1,103
"unmedaled" campaigns

I have been wondering why some WWII campaigns were not conmemorated with medals, like the liberation of Romania, Bulgaria, Manchuria and Korea. Were those campaigns not so important or they just omitted them from the medal`s list?


Thanks in advice
__________________
There's nothing in the streets
Looks any different to me
And the slogans are replaced, by-the-bye
And the parting on the left
Are now parting on the right
And the beards have all grown longer overnight

The Who, Won't get fooled again
Esteban_cool is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 09-14-2005, 08:23 AM   #2
Tretov
Senior Member
 
Tretov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Republic of Finland
Posts: 1,129
The wars with Finland did not get any specific medals either.... nor the anniversary "10 years of Victory".
Tretov is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 09:12 AM   #3
Nack
Senior Member
 
Nack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Buckeye State
Age: 46
Posts: 513
I would guess that the decision to institute a medal was totally political.

The capture/liberation series of medals seemed to involve politically/strategically important cities for the USSR after the war (generally). I don’t think Romania, Bulgaria, Manchuria and Korea were as important to the Soviets in the early post-war times as were Germany, Poland, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia.

As to the lack of the 10 years of victory in the GPW, 10 years would have been 1955, at which time the Soviets were doing rather well in spreading communism and making scientific advances. By 1965, things were arguably not as good, and perhaps the government felt a bit of rah-rah stuff was necessary to pep up morale?
Nack is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 09:50 AM   #4
Eugene
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tretov
The wars with Finland did not get any specific medals either.... nor the anniversary "10 years of Victory".
The medals for defense of Leningrad and Arctic Region were given for 1941-1944 war with Finland as well. The Soviet army didn't have to fight for Finish cities. You know that better than me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by T. Nackowicz
I I don’t think Romania, Bulgaria, Manchuria and Korea were as important to the Soviets in the early post-war times as were Germany, Poland, Yugoslavia, and Czechoslovakia.
Also, when Soviet Army has reached the borders of Romania and Bulgaria, they declared war on their former allien Germany and Red Army didn't have to fight for Bucharest and Sofia as much as for Warsaw, Kenigsberg, or some other cities.
Eugene is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 10:36 AM   #5
Simon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 173
Please, allow me to share my thoughts and ask questions on the subject.

Romania and Bulgaria were Germany's allies, not countries under the occupation. Both of them signed separate cease-fire agreements with the Soviet Union. Did Red Army actually fight for Bucharest and Sofia or simply march in following the diplomatic agreement?

Manchuria and Korea were liberated during a lightning campaign that was over in a matter of weeks. Decision makers must have thought that "Victory over Japan" medal was sufficient to commemorate battles in the Far East.

War with Finland was fought before the tradition to strike medals in honor of campaigns originated. Major engagements before Finnish War had their badges, not medals. Though Finland was beaten, Red Army suffered heavy casualties and failed to occupy the entire country. Stalin must have viewed the campaign as unworthy of even a badge. Besides, was the war with Finland supposed to be a prelude to a larger campaign? I don't want to advertise theories of a certain historian, but his arguments are worth consideration. So far I haven't been able to find acceptable counterarguments. He also offers his explanation for why '10 years V of Germany' medal was not established.

Simon

P.S. While I was writing this post, Eugene already answered my question about Bucharest and Sofia.

Last edited by Simon; 09-14-2005 at 10:40 AM.
Simon is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 11:42 AM   #6
Nack
Senior Member
 
Nack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Buckeye State
Age: 46
Posts: 513
This is all very interesting stuff. To what does the above-referenced author attribute the lack of a 10-years-of-victory medal (I don't think I know the historan you are talking about)?
Nack is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 01:03 PM   #7
Tretov
Senior Member
 
Tretov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Republic of Finland
Posts: 1,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eugene
The medals for defense of Leningrad and Arctic Region were given for 1941-1944 war with Finland as well. The Soviet army didn't have to fight for Finish cities. You know that better than me.
Viipuri, which was one of the largest cities in Finland at the time, was captured, lost and re-captured (and finally kept) after heavy battles.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon
War with Finland was fought before the tradition to strike medals in honor of campaigns originated. Major engagements before Finnish War had their badges, not medals. Though Finland was beaten, Red Army suffered heavy casualties and failed to occupy the entire country. Stalin must have viewed the campaign as unworthy of even a badge. Besides, was the war with Finland supposed to be a prelude to a larger campaign? I don't want to advertise theories of a certain historian, but his arguments are worth consideration. So far I haven't been able to find acceptable counterarguments. He also offers his explanation for why '10 years V of Germany' medal was not established.
The Soviet Union had two wars with Finland, 1939-1940 and 1941-1944. The later one was in larger scale than the first one, but as stated in the thread, it seems to have been included in the Polar Regions medal.

As for the purpose of the Winter war... I dont know for sure either, political and strategical reasons (Soviet demanded territories, access to naval bases and airfields etc etc like from the baltic states). It would be too long to debate here so I guess we better refer to history books for the details.

This is a very interesting thread though!

Last edited by Tretov; 09-14-2005 at 01:06 PM.
Tretov is offline  
Old 09-14-2005, 07:27 PM   #8
Simon
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 173
Quote:
Originally Posted by T. Nackowicz
This is all very interesting stuff. To what does the above-referenced author attribute the lack of a 10-years-of-victory medal (I don't think I know the historan you are talking about)?
The historian is a Soviet defector Vladimir Rezun who publishes books under the pseudonym Victor Suvorov. If you ever read his writing, please do so with caution. People who take their time to check his sources often find them twisted or non-existent. In my opinion, his works are at least partially based on true facts and contain thought-provoking analysis. At the same time, I feel that his sensationalistic style and Earth-shattering conclusions are secrets of his success. His books read like mystery novels and are geared towards masses that don't bother to verify what he writes. He claims that Stalin scheduled an attack on Germany on July 6, 1941. Because of Hitler's preemptive strike, Soviet plans were ruined and Red Army didn't reach Paris and Madrid. Stalin had to settle for eastern Europe and felt that he lost the war. For this reason, Suvorov argues, 10th anniversary of victory was not celebrated. In 1955, USSR was still ruled by men who held senior government positions in 1941 and knew how disappointing the result of WW2 was for Russia. Consequently, at the time of 10th anniversary, medals were not struck, commemorative coins were not minted, parade was not held. In 1965, Brezhnev was GenSek. During the war, he was only Major-General and didn't see the big picture. On 20th anniversary, Brezhnev made Victory Day a national holiday that was celebrated with medals, coins and parade.

Suvorov's conclusions are far from being the most shocking. One historian claims that entire Russian history, as we know it, was fabricated by Romanov dynasty and A. Nevsky was King Ghiz Khan, not a Russian knyaz. Surprisingly, G. Kasparov, the world chess champion, subscribes to this theory.
Simon is offline  
Old 09-16-2005, 08:32 PM   #9
Dave
Senior Member
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Age: 49
Posts: 700
I remember also reading that the reason that they began celebrating the "...Years of Victory" was because of the rise of post traumatic stress disorder that began appearing amongst Soviet veterans during the early 1960s. In order to combat this, the Soviet government began a long process of near hero-worship of the WW2 veterans. Thus, the reason that the 20th anniversary was such a huge celebration, and every 10 years thereafter. From other sources that I read, I tend to believe this theory. There is no way that 4 straight years of combat for many of the veterans could have had a positive psychological impact on them...

Dave
Dave is offline  
 

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Moderator of "Flags and Banners" and "Uniforms, Hats and Insignia" Art Forum Announcements And Rules 0 01-24-2003 05:39 PM
New Moderator of "Fake Alert!" and "Reference Materials For Sale" Art Forum Announcements And Rules 0 05-19-2002 09:52 AM


WW2 US Army Canvas Bag picture

WW2 US Army Canvas Bag

$49.99



Beautiful 2 Reichspfennig Nazi Coin: Genuine Bronze Third Reich Germany WW2-era picture

Beautiful 2 Reichspfennig Nazi Coin: Genuine Bronze Third Reich Germany WW2-era

$7.88



US WW2 M3 Colt 1911 45 Shoulder Holster Premium Drum Dyed Leather marked JT&L 43 picture

US WW2 M3 Colt 1911 45 Shoulder Holster Premium Drum Dyed Leather marked JT&L 43

$38.99



US WW2 M1916 Colt 1911 .45 Holster OD Cotton Webbing Experimental M1Holster picture

US WW2 M1916 Colt 1911 .45 Holster OD Cotton Webbing Experimental M1Holster

$34.99



U.S. WW2 M1 HELMET LINER picture

U.S. WW2 M1 HELMET LINER

$34.99



WWII WW2 USGI Model M1 Garand Bayonet for 1903 Springfield 1903A3 Knife Used picture

WWII WW2 USGI Model M1 Garand Bayonet for 1903 Springfield 1903A3 Knife Used

$59.99



US WW2 Springfield M1923 Garand Cartridge Canvas 10 Pocket Belt Khakhi Bandolier picture

US WW2 Springfield M1923 Garand Cartridge Canvas 10 Pocket Belt Khakhi Bandolier

$31.95



WW2 Airborne Clicker US Army 101st Spy Normandy Landings Prop Crickets picture

WW2 Airborne Clicker US Army 101st Spy Normandy Landings Prop Crickets

$15.99



SURPLUS WW2 US M1 CARBINE SLING GUN STRAP ORIGINAL  picture

SURPLUS WW2 US M1 CARBINE SLING GUN STRAP ORIGINAL

$34.19



US WW2 M1 Helmet with Chin Strap Net Cover Army Military Reproduction WWII picture

US WW2 M1 Helmet with Chin Strap Net Cover Army Military Reproduction WWII

$36.09




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright ©2011 Arthur G. Bates III