Fake Good Service Medals - Page 2

Al-muell · 05-05-2014, 11:31 PM

Sorry for the late reply, I forgotten about this two. here are the pics

Not even a guess, anyone?

TakeshiKovacs · 05-13-2014, 08:51 PM

I'm sure its nothing to be concerned about, these being super common and all. But I'm just starting a collection, so the common ones seemed a good place to begin =)

Anyways, i grabbed these three for about 15 bucks. The 1st and 2nd class look fine, but the 3rd class on the left seems...funny. The worn patch and the very different suspension are throwing me off. Seems silly anyone would fake these, but hey, weirder things happen.

Shocktrooper · 10-26-2014, 08:26 AM

Hello guys,

a friend of mine gave me this one to check and I was perplexed:

It seems to be issued for MOOP Estonia, but this one reads "MOOP EST. SSR" instead of "MOOP ESSR" !? I have never seen this one before; the coining is crisp clear and the gilding done in high quality just as seen on all genuine medals !? One fellow collector has the opinion that it could be a prototype for Estonia !? Any ideas ??? The collector says that it was bought in 1991.

Thanks a lot !

***desantnik*** · 10-26-2014, 08:51 AM

The story about 1991 is nice, but you can't hang a hat on it.

If it does not appear in recognized references, there is a chance that it could be still legitimate but I wouldn't count on it. The burden of proof is not on the references that have been incorporating 20 years of information.

Look at the "smashed" border at 12 o'clock. I'd say this is a fantasy piece or made by someone that didn't know how the proper abbreviation should read...

***CtahhR*** · 10-26-2014, 09:15 AM

I would certainly agree that the "smashed" bit by the ring is the greatest sign that this item is not legitimate.

1991, 2001, 2011 or any other year, fakes have existed for a long time before these dates.

Shocktrooper · 10-26-2014, 02:44 PM

Thank you very much ! I thought the same, but was a little bit uncertain due to the good quality of coining... :thumbsup

10-26-2014, 08:51 AM	#14
*desantnik* Forum Moderator Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Eurasia Posts: 2,339	Re: Fake Good Service Medals The story about 1991 is nice, but you can't hang a hat on it. If it does not appear in recognized references, there is a chance that it could be still legitimate but I wouldn't count on it. The burden of proof is not on the references that have been incorporating 20 years of information. Look at the "smashed" border at 12 o'clock. I'd say this is a fantasy piece or made by someone that didn't know how the proper abbreviation should read...

10-26-2014, 09:15 AM	#15
*CtahhR* Forum Administrator Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Deep In The Archives. Age: 17 Posts: 12,074	Re: Fake Good Service Medals I would certainly agree that the "smashed" bit by the ring is the greatest sign that this item is not legitimate. 1991, 2001, 2011 or any other year, fakes have existed for a long time before these dates. __________________ "Signed with his own rubber stamp"

10-26-2014, 02:44 PM	#16
Shocktrooper Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Germany Age: 49 Posts: 105	Re: Fake Good Service Medals Thank you very much ! I thought the same, but was a little bit uncertain due to the good quality of coining... :thumbsup

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Fake Medals "For Combat Merits"	bertastan	Fake Medals	335	05-04-2016 04:29 PM
Fake Medals "For Distinction In Military Service".	rocketscientist	Fake Medals	12	11-29-2012 10:16 AM
Good service medals KGB (both Types) and MVD	Laurent	Sold Soviet Awards Archive	3	09-30-2006 09:40 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)