06-08-2003, 10:34 PM
Bill,
I don't know why it wasn't the rule. Off course, documents and medals were prenumbered. Maybe, because these medals were awarded by special commette and not by Supreme Soviete, they didn't follow procedure to match document and medal. From my experience, persentage of matching sets is very low. I realize, some of the sets could be made up, but if you see over 90% unmatching sets, such large number can not be made up.
It's nut just my luck that I didn't observe so many matching sets. Out of curiousity, I've asked two of the biggest suppliers of such awards on American market. Even so many dozens of such awards past hands of each of them, number of matching numbers was extremely low(less than Tal observed alone). It's not just my bad luck.
And why 1st price should differ from 2nd, 3rd or Lenin prize? Some of them matching as well but mostly they don't.
However, my point was that unmatching serial numbers and mint condition is not a cretaria of fake set.
Matching number could be observed in all rangers of medals, but for the first prize they are usially seen for later issued with s/n > 20000.
Below is an image of the group, that came to me directly form the widow of recepient. I apologize for taking some space, but it's an interesting set.
The recepient was documentary movie maker and has got the Stalin prize for film "Free China". He got Chinese order as well.
His both state prizes are reissues for Stalin prize. The document for one Stalin prize survived. Even the medals were awarded in 1962 they are in mint condition. Serial numbers of medals are 0244, 0245, numbers on State prize documents are 0971, 0972.
I can tell exatly how many matching sets got recepients, but my estimations based on my experience and data from the biggest suppliers, would be definately less then 20%, more likely like less than 10%.
I don't know why it wasn't the rule. Off course, documents and medals were prenumbered. Maybe, because these medals were awarded by special commette and not by Supreme Soviete, they didn't follow procedure to match document and medal. From my experience, persentage of matching sets is very low. I realize, some of the sets could be made up, but if you see over 90% unmatching sets, such large number can not be made up.
It's nut just my luck that I didn't observe so many matching sets. Out of curiousity, I've asked two of the biggest suppliers of such awards on American market. Even so many dozens of such awards past hands of each of them, number of matching numbers was extremely low(less than Tal observed alone). It's not just my bad luck.
And why 1st price should differ from 2nd, 3rd or Lenin prize? Some of them matching as well but mostly they don't.
However, my point was that unmatching serial numbers and mint condition is not a cretaria of fake set.
Matching number could be observed in all rangers of medals, but for the first prize they are usially seen for later issued with s/n > 20000.
Below is an image of the group, that came to me directly form the widow of recepient. I apologize for taking some space, but it's an interesting set.
The recepient was documentary movie maker and has got the Stalin prize for film "Free China". He got Chinese order as well.
His both state prizes are reissues for Stalin prize. The document for one Stalin prize survived. Even the medals were awarded in 1962 they are in mint condition. Serial numbers of medals are 0244, 0245, numbers on State prize documents are 0971, 0972.
I can tell exatly how many matching sets got recepients, but my estimations based on my experience and data from the biggest suppliers, would be definately less then 20%, more likely like less than 10%.












