Posts: 351
Threads: 22
Joined: Apr 2007
Reputation:
0
It's all very complicated. News reports note that the Tajiks are really annoyed at the Russians right now for apparently backing out of a hydroelectric plant deal after the Medvedev visited Uzbekistan and locked in some exclusive gas deals (the Uzbeks and Tajiks are arguing over water - critical to Uzbek cotton, and needed for Tajik power when the Uzbeks cut off electrical supplies - tough circle); the Azeris probably don't like strong Russian support of the Armenians in their spats; the Kyrgyz go back and forth over Manas over just two or three weeks between US and Russian visits; Russians try to lock in all FSU gas and oil to squeeze the Ukrainians and EU; honest reporters gunned down throughout Russia, making it the most dangerous place on earth for journalists (more so than Iraq). It's a strange thing, all of this, not nice for a comfortable and safe future. But... I doubt you'll see an easy way to form a real and coordinated "quick reaction force" among this lot. It sounds like more noise and less teeth to me.
Posts: 146
Threads: 12
Joined: Feb 2006
Reputation:
0
i agree that it won't be a major force, i just wonder if doing it so close to the US losing access to a military base gives russia the ability to move troops into a more forward deployment 9under the guise of rapid reaction) while the Us is pulling back from the front. an interesting game is beign played here