Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Badge "Ready For Labour And Defence Of The U.S.S.R.".
#51
Here's another one similar to the two that started this thread but pinback, not screwback.
I can't tell from the feel if it's brass or an alloy similar but it's got the usual nice, real enamel to it. I get a late 60s/early 70s vibe from it.


Attached Files Image(s)
sport6o.jpg sport6r.jpg
"patina imparts character" - PJS
A wise man said: 'you should not pay a premium for what you want beyond your comfort level, and always ensure there is a mutually agreeable return policy.'
Reply
#52
It sure looks like brass and I think you are correct about the time period.:thumbsup

Phillip
Phillip
Reply
#53
Looks like 3367.b on page 639 in Avers 8. That would make it a '46-61 version.

Simon
Reply
#54
Hi Guys, a new addition to my collection.

Cheers, Ade.


Attached Files Image(s)
Sports badge 001.jpg Sports badge 002.jpg
Reply
#55
Here is a 1949 pattern document for the 2nd class badge.

Simon


Attached Files Image(s)
1949 GTO Badge Document-1.jpg 1949 GTO Badge Document-2.jpg
Reply
#56
The first GTO badges (1936) with the document


Attached Files Image(s)
1-GTO-Dok1935.jpg 2-GTO-ЦИК.JPG 3-GTO-CCCP.jpg
Reply
#57
An excellent documented badge! Something I've been after for a while but always slips through my fingers. Is it just me or does the document say 1935?
Reply
#58
CtahhR Wrote:An excellent documented badge! Something I've been after for a while but always slips through my fingers. Is it just me or does the document say 1935?

The document says 1935, I made a mistake saying 1936 :D
Reply
#59
Nice badges - I have lusted over these for a while :thumbsup

The numbers on the tightening nut and the badges don't appear to match. Should they?

Simon
Reply
#60
UQWozza Wrote:The numbers on the tightening nut and the badges don't appear to match. Should they?

Simon

No :)
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Militaria for sale on