11-02-2012, 08:00 PM
The fact that this topic is in "The Researchers Corner" suggests that you have facts concerning the background of these awards, but you don't. It's not that this topic should be edited or added to when someone provides facts proving the contrary, it should be removed from this section now. Innocent [unresearched] until proven guilty [researched].
Occam's razor is a very dangerous method to use here! Are you really comparing research with probability? Should we really consider an award researched when somebody has provided a probable, but unproven story?
Occam's razor is a very dangerous method to use here! Are you really comparing research with probability? Should we really consider an award researched when somebody has provided a probable, but unproven story?
