03-27-2007, 03:50 PM
Thus, the Decree of Presidium of the Supreme body of the USSR from February, 20th, 1978 about rewarding L.I.Brezhnev by an award "Victory" and in this respect completely corresponds to the statute of this award. It is possible even to tell, that this rewarding originally crowned enormous self-denying work of Soviet people on creation of such conditions when war with Soviet Union became equivalent to suicide for the one who will begin it.
And, at last, fourthly. Gorbachev, publishing the Decree, has left a legal field. Procedures of the CANCELLING of decrees about rewarding in " General provisions... " It was not provided. There was a procedure of deprivation of the awards, more exhaustively described in clause 40: " Deprivation of an award, a medal of the USSR, a rank of the Hero of Soviet Union, a rank of the Hero of Socialist Work, a rank "Mother-heroine", honorary titles of the USSR can be made only by Presidium of the Supreme body of the USSR in cases:
Condemnation награжденного for grave crime - on representation of court on the basis of and by way of, established by the legislation;
Fulfilment by the person of the offence discrediting it as награжденного - on representation of the body possessing the right of entering of representation about rewarding;
Deprivations награжденного citizenship of the USSR ".
What does it mean? It seems to me, even one infringement of this clause does горбачевский the decree wrongful. It is necessary to tell, that Gorbachev published this document including in the populist purposes. It knew, that the chorus of selling mass-media will support it and will generate corresponding public opinion among any part of our population. However ridiculously to see the person who has disorganized great power, in a role of the guarantor of the statute of any award of this power.
Practice, by the way, testifies, that statutes of awards were not fetters for Presidium of the Supreme body of USSR. It widely used rules of clauses 3 and 6 " General provisions... " . The state on advantage estimated character and a degree of merits awarded and defined a kind of the award. This main thing. We can find many examples when decrees about rewarding as if contradicted statutes of awards. For example, well-known Soviet gunmakers Грабин and Tokarev were gentlemen полководческого Suvorov's awards. And if to follow словоблудной Gorbachev's to logic it would be necessary to cancel at the same time in 1989, for example, decrees about their rewarding, about rewardings within war more than 1500 military units Suvorov's award, 1570 military units Kutuzov's award, 7 parts of Navy fleet Nakhimov's award and so on. Under the statutes these awards are intended for rewarding command structure of Armed forces. And rewardings of foreigners by an award "Victory"? Those never were commanders of our armies and the more so did not belong to " the maximum command structure of Red Army ".
It is assured, that a cancelling of rewarding in general, and the more so in 11 years as procedure would not pass ethical examination. The indicative facts results in clause of Century Пахомов (" the Soviet Russia ", 23.10.2003 years). Agreeing with Gorbachev's decree, it, nevertheless, writes, that " during post-war time there were owners of four awards of Glory though the statute similar did not provide ". Exclamation Further follows: " to not select one of four awards of Glory! ".
Certainly, during Great Domestic war Leonid Ilich Brezhnev though held a high post in army, but could not be compared to those opportunities which gentlemen of an award "Victory" of those years possessed. But when began to possess such opportunities, it has directed them on strengthening of defense of the country and maintenance of a peace life to all Soviet people. I shall not sin against true if I shall tell, that as we now see, L.I.Brezhnev was last head tempered by the front-line soldier who, not regretting the stomach, fought for honour, freedom and power of our great Native land.
Soldiers at the front dreamed, that any more there was no war. Together with them with such ideas general Brezhnev has finished war and the chief of political department of 4-th Ukrainian front, the commissioner summary a shelf of this front on the well-known Parade of the Victory. That generation has achieved it. The strategic parity has made war with Soviet Union unacceptable.
As if to Gorbachev in 1978 it was a member of the Central Committee of the CPSU, the first secretary Stavropol крайкома parties and already packed suitcases for crossing to Moscow on a post of the secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU. We shall draw a hypothetical picture. It in fact could then as member of the Central Committee of the CPSU, possessing diploma of a faculty of law of the Moscow State University, to speak against rewarding L.I.Brezhnev by an award "Victory". Quite. But then, you will tell, probably would follow "оргвыводы" concerning Gorbachev. Probably. But I shall ask you, dear readers to estimate, from скольких misfortunes Soviet Union as a result of such "оргвыводов" would be relieved. Certainly, for the future of " the person of year ", " the person of decade " would not be squeals " Hunch, Hunch " in foreign cities and весях, there would be no Nobel Prize, ranks " the best German ", there would be no advertising a pizza.
The prospect of loss of such "prizes" as we now see, was for this purpose господинчика intolerable. It paid off with party and the country which it did not create for their reception and did not protect. For by did not stand.
It is necessary to understand, that Gorbachev the then decree has in essence spat in soul of generation which has transformed Soviet Union into the second superstate.
by M. Nazarenko, Alma-Ata
And, at last, fourthly. Gorbachev, publishing the Decree, has left a legal field. Procedures of the CANCELLING of decrees about rewarding in " General provisions... " It was not provided. There was a procedure of deprivation of the awards, more exhaustively described in clause 40: " Deprivation of an award, a medal of the USSR, a rank of the Hero of Soviet Union, a rank of the Hero of Socialist Work, a rank "Mother-heroine", honorary titles of the USSR can be made only by Presidium of the Supreme body of the USSR in cases:
Condemnation награжденного for grave crime - on representation of court on the basis of and by way of, established by the legislation;
Fulfilment by the person of the offence discrediting it as награжденного - on representation of the body possessing the right of entering of representation about rewarding;
Deprivations награжденного citizenship of the USSR ".
What does it mean? It seems to me, even one infringement of this clause does горбачевский the decree wrongful. It is necessary to tell, that Gorbachev published this document including in the populist purposes. It knew, that the chorus of selling mass-media will support it and will generate corresponding public opinion among any part of our population. However ridiculously to see the person who has disorganized great power, in a role of the guarantor of the statute of any award of this power.
Practice, by the way, testifies, that statutes of awards were not fetters for Presidium of the Supreme body of USSR. It widely used rules of clauses 3 and 6 " General provisions... " . The state on advantage estimated character and a degree of merits awarded and defined a kind of the award. This main thing. We can find many examples when decrees about rewarding as if contradicted statutes of awards. For example, well-known Soviet gunmakers Грабин and Tokarev were gentlemen полководческого Suvorov's awards. And if to follow словоблудной Gorbachev's to logic it would be necessary to cancel at the same time in 1989, for example, decrees about their rewarding, about rewardings within war more than 1500 military units Suvorov's award, 1570 military units Kutuzov's award, 7 parts of Navy fleet Nakhimov's award and so on. Under the statutes these awards are intended for rewarding command structure of Armed forces. And rewardings of foreigners by an award "Victory"? Those never were commanders of our armies and the more so did not belong to " the maximum command structure of Red Army ".
It is assured, that a cancelling of rewarding in general, and the more so in 11 years as procedure would not pass ethical examination. The indicative facts results in clause of Century Пахомов (" the Soviet Russia ", 23.10.2003 years). Agreeing with Gorbachev's decree, it, nevertheless, writes, that " during post-war time there were owners of four awards of Glory though the statute similar did not provide ". Exclamation Further follows: " to not select one of four awards of Glory! ".
Certainly, during Great Domestic war Leonid Ilich Brezhnev though held a high post in army, but could not be compared to those opportunities which gentlemen of an award "Victory" of those years possessed. But when began to possess such opportunities, it has directed them on strengthening of defense of the country and maintenance of a peace life to all Soviet people. I shall not sin against true if I shall tell, that as we now see, L.I.Brezhnev was last head tempered by the front-line soldier who, not regretting the stomach, fought for honour, freedom and power of our great Native land.
Soldiers at the front dreamed, that any more there was no war. Together with them with such ideas general Brezhnev has finished war and the chief of political department of 4-th Ukrainian front, the commissioner summary a shelf of this front on the well-known Parade of the Victory. That generation has achieved it. The strategic parity has made war with Soviet Union unacceptable.
As if to Gorbachev in 1978 it was a member of the Central Committee of the CPSU, the first secretary Stavropol крайкома parties and already packed suitcases for crossing to Moscow on a post of the secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU. We shall draw a hypothetical picture. It in fact could then as member of the Central Committee of the CPSU, possessing diploma of a faculty of law of the Moscow State University, to speak against rewarding L.I.Brezhnev by an award "Victory". Quite. But then, you will tell, probably would follow "оргвыводы" concerning Gorbachev. Probably. But I shall ask you, dear readers to estimate, from скольких misfortunes Soviet Union as a result of such "оргвыводов" would be relieved. Certainly, for the future of " the person of year ", " the person of decade " would not be squeals " Hunch, Hunch " in foreign cities and весях, there would be no Nobel Prize, ranks " the best German ", there would be no advertising a pizza.
The prospect of loss of such "prizes" as we now see, was for this purpose господинчика intolerable. It paid off with party and the country which it did not create for their reception and did not protect. For by did not stand.
It is necessary to understand, that Gorbachev the then decree has in essence spat in soul of generation which has transformed Soviet Union into the second superstate.
by M. Nazarenko, Alma-Ata
