Fake Orders of Labor Glory

[Alfred]

Any oppinions about this second class s/n: 26.628?
The engraving of the serial number looks different to other 2nd class pices in this range.

I attached a picture of s/n: 26.676 for camparison.

Does anybody have other serial numbers near by to compare the engraving style?

best regards and thanks
Andreas

[Shocktrooper]

Hi,

looks like a scratch fake !

[Kjetil Kvist]

I have come over a collection with some better orders and medals, and I hope it is ok to post pictures here for your comments. (Long since I last was active, but I have been busy with other collectibles the last few years...)

Now a Order of Labor Glory I. #1552

[Alfred]

Originally Posted by KjetilK

I have come over a collection with some better orders and medals, and I hope it is ok to post pictures here for your comments. (Long since I last was active, but I have been busy with other collectibles the last few years...)

Now a Order of Labor Glory I. #1552

According to Mondvor highest observed number was 0976.
As this is a very rare award, I can´t say somthing to this.

Andreas

Hello to everyone, just registered on this website. Would like to know your opinion about the authenticity of an OLG 2 which I am considering buying. Many thanks for feedback!

[USSR]

Wel, I'm not an expert on these but if I see the pictures correctly, they are from a very well known dealer who is to be trusted. Therefor I say :thumbsup But let's see what others have to say

Welcome btw! :)

[Alfred]

Nice piece :thumbsup

[aironmeiden]

Originally Posted by KjetilK

I have come over a collection with some better orders and medals, and I hope it is ok to post pictures here for your comments. (Long since I last was active, but I have been busy with other collectibles the last few years...)

Now a Order of Labor Glory I. #1552

There are clear signs of erasure after the last digit. The surface is not even and the serial line is too short.
For me is :thumbsdown

[charlet]

Originally Posted by aironmeiden

There are clear signs of erasure after the last digit. The surface is not even and the serial line is too short.
For me is :thumbsdown

clearly yes, and they didn't take the pain do put a bit of dirt over the spot polished. It seems the red enamel is not perfectly "pure", like if there was some dirt or reflects in it.

[igrek]

Hello,
I'd like to get your opinion on this LG-2.
I'm concerned about a few things: quite deep "wells" for rivets (which are below the surface and are very shiny); and a few spots (visible under microscope) of blue enamel where its not suppose to be.
Thanks in advance for any comment!