Combat Honour Medal.

Dolf · 12-12-2005, 02:57 PM

The enamel ribbon for the Honorary Medal of Combat.

Dolf

Dolf · 12-12-2005, 03:10 PM

The cloth ribbon for the Honorary Medal of Combat.

Dolf

new world · 02-22-2007, 02:22 PM

Some eye candy:

Early Medal for Combat Service SN 157, T1 V1 in case of issue. One of the first medals awarded.

This particular variation is not listed in Dr. Battushig's book (not sure why).

William

Sergei · 02-22-2007, 06:03 PM

William,
Great medal :thumbsup
May I ask a very indiscreet question - does the box smell of anything on the inside?
:o :chuckle
Sergei

kingsnorth · 02-23-2007, 05:13 AM

William

Excuse my ignorance but what makes it different variation because it looks like a standard early medal with faded green leaves.I've been collecting Mongolian awards for a few years and thought I had all variations of that particular medal.
I'm not being awkward but genuinely interested in new info.
Cheers
Keith

new world · 02-23-2007, 06:52 AM

T1 V1 medals all had hand-engraved serial number and the Cyrillic "N" in front of SN.

Same as Soviet T1 V1 Bravery, Mil Merit and Labor medals.

T1 V2 were without Cyrillic "N".

William

medals73 · 02-24-2007, 09:33 AM

Yes, a nice Type 1.1. So far, the lowest number observed has been 112, so, close, but no carnation. So far, the data are too fragmentary to give any for of solid date-of-award estimate, but surely pre-1953, so POSSIBLY a long service award (post-1947).

When the records are open . . . :D

Sergei · 01-18-2009, 10:26 AM

This thread is very quiet. Thought I would post something to keep us going.
Sergei

Pravda · 11-21-2009, 10:48 PM

Sergei,

That is a great example! It looks to be in perfect condition and it is not often that you see one with such a low serial.

Cheers,
Will

Nota Bene · 11-22-2009, 09:58 PM

Nice piece! The lowest number I have seen was a single digit. Should've kept it.

Alexei

11-21-2009, 10:48 PM	#9
Pravda Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Anywhere and Everywhere Posts: 116	Re: Very early Medal for Combat Service Sergei, That is a great example! It looks to be in perfect condition and it is not often that you see one with such a low serial. Cheers, Will

11-22-2009, 09:58 PM	#10
Nota Bene Senior Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: New York USA Posts: 2,296	Re: Very early Medal for Combat Service Nice piece! The lowest number I have seen was a single digit. Should've kept it. Alexei

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Honour Medal.	CtahhR	Islamic Republic Of Afghanistan	4	06-19-2019 03:24 PM
OSCE Mission To Georgia Honour Of Service Medal.	CtahhR	Post-Communist Nations	1	02-21-2014 11:56 AM
Military Service Honour Medal.	CtahhR	DPRK State Medals	11	02-10-2014 12:14 PM
Erdenet Copper Mine Honour Medal.	medals73	Mongolian Medals	0	02-20-2012 02:24 PM
Combat Cooperation Medal	Nota Bene	Sold Soviet Awards Archive	2	05-11-2006 05:31 PM

02-22-2007, 06:03 PM	#4
Sergei Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: London, UK Posts: 199	William, Great medal :thumbsup May I ask a very indiscreet question - does the box smell of anything on the inside? :o :chuckle Sergei

02-23-2007, 05:13 AM	#5
kingsnorth Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: England Age: 66 Posts: 35	William Excuse my ignorance but what makes it different variation because it looks like a standard early medal with faded green leaves.I've been collecting Mongolian awards for a few years and thought I had all variations of that particular medal. I'm not being awkward but genuinely interested in new info. Cheers Keith

02-23-2007, 06:52 AM	#6
new world Senior Member Join Date: May 2002 Location: NYC, USA Posts: 1,086	T1 V1 medals all had hand-engraved serial number and the Cyrillic "N" in front of SN. Same as Soviet T1 V1 Bravery, Mil Merit and Labor medals. T1 V2 were without Cyrillic "N". William

02-24-2007, 09:33 AM	#7
medals73 Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Earth, most of the time Posts: 2,016	Yes, a nice Type 1.1. So far, the lowest number observed has been 112, so, close, but no carnation. So far, the data are too fragmentary to give any for of solid date-of-award estimate, but surely pre-1953, so POSSIBLY a long service award (post-1947). When the records are open . . . :D

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)