Posts: 374
Threads: 38
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
0
okay folks,
thanks for all help.
all of my questions have been answered so far.
i'll try to post a pic as i get the cap in.
kind regards ser-g
Posts: 374
Threads: 38
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
0
Hi folks,
I just got the cap in,
it seems worn a bit the diamond has worn a slight bit.
the cord indeed seems a hole bit more bright yellow (really noticeble).
the cocard indeed is a nice example of a 2 piece general type.
the buttons are standard buttons and not the general SU gerb.
Overal it is a really nice cap with general grade materials and silk lining.
what could explain the normal butóns on the cap?
Posts: 374
Threads: 38
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
0
Posts: 1,822
Threads: 186
Joined: Mar 2003
Reputation:
0
I thinkthat either the buttons were replaced or it is for honour guards, not a general's cap. If the crown is very steep (it seems to be) the second option seems to be correct.
Posts: 2,060
Threads: 152
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation:
0
I think it was an unissued generals cap that was 'finished' with whatever they had; a generals cap badge, but officers buttons and cap cords.
DougD
Posts: 374
Threads: 38
Joined: Oct 2007
Reputation:
0
what is your deffinision on a steep frond ?
the cord is fare more yellow in collor than normal officer.
i always thot that was a sign of a generals cord?
the buttons are stitched on and are of corred date 1978.
was it usual to have the buttons stitched on ? instead of the metal pins?