10-30-2005, 02:20 PM
I have little doubts that this document is a good quality fake, but I'd like others' opinions,
Marc
Marc
|
Fake Medal "50 Years Of Militsia" Document.
|
|
10-30-2005, 02:20 PM
I have little doubts that this document is a good quality fake, but I'd like others' opinions,
Marc
07-18-2015, 01:22 PM
This one seems to scream "fake".
- stamp that looks like a 1 rubble coin; - lack of issuing institution/person data (don't believe it just faded, thisdoc isnotold enough); - no rank given - common surname, untracable even with uncommon name like Sidor. But is thedocument itself authentic? Or fake too?
07-18-2015, 01:28 PM
To me it looks like it is a fake document with fake entries. The writing is appalling (although I have seen worse on real documents) but not as bad as that rubber stamp. If only all bad items were this crude.
"Signed with his own rubber stamp"
04-27-2017, 11:52 AM
How about this one?
Came with a few other items to the same militia officer and looks good, but there is one detail that makes me doubt about this one.
04-27-2017, 01:04 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2018, 08:14 PM by Bill Garvy.)
Is it meant to be "Начальник УООП Сах Облисполкома"?
04-27-2017, 05:45 PM
It's Сахоблисполком - Sakhalin Oblast Ispolkom - it is consistent with other docs.
What makes me doubt here is the fact that the last row on the stamp says "No.2*For administrative and money documents*"
04-27-2017, 08:25 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-27-2017, 09:01 PM by Bill Garvy.)
Perhaps the wrong stamp was used...
04-27-2017, 10:14 PM
I gave this a good looking at this morning. I think it is good. If you look at the clerical errors - they are consistent. Feel and smell are something else however.
"Signed with his own rubber stamp"
04-28-2017, 10:33 AM
Many thanks!
I will likely be presenting the group in the proper section after the long weekend (which we have here untill May 3rd). |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|