04-21-2010, 09:36 AM
EricFG about the screw nut try to put in the soda and hot water, over the night. Or white vinegar. But both methods would wash away the patina.
|
Guards Badges
|
|
04-21-2010, 09:36 AM
EricFG about the screw nut try to put in the soda and hot water, over the night. Or white vinegar. But both methods would wash away the patina.
06-30-2010, 04:38 AM
OK, here's one I've never seen before. I'm not saying they did not exist, but even the enamel looks more like paint because it is so drawn into the background.
It could be a replacement attachment, but the seller does not indicate that to be the case. Phillip
Phillip
06-30-2010, 05:38 PM
I guess it's one those newly made. You see in some republics including RF, they do badges mostly with original dies left. In Russia the call those 'novodel' (novyj-new, sdelanno-made)
According to Airapetyan's Avers
07-01-2010, 08:54 AM
If I read properly, it was manufactured in 2001!!!
Marc
07-01-2010, 10:44 AM
Thath is about variation 19. The badge discussed is variation 18.7
here are the previous pages I though this might be interesting subject to hunt: tombac, hot enamel same book says
07-01-2010, 08:50 PM
Didn't someone post a picture of the lower badge with the big clasp somewhere on the forum just a while ago?
07-01-2010, 10:36 PM
Stahanov Wrote:Didn't someone post a picture of the lower badge with the big clasp somewhere on the forum just a while ago? An example
07-02-2010, 03:51 AM
Lapa Wrote:If I read properly, it was manufactured in 2001!!! Marc, Uhm, I saw that too but figured I was misreading it at possibly a copyright date for the publication.:o This has me thinking: how many of these were made for the tourist trade? The one I posted certainly used paint instead of enamel (or a very inferior enamel). Phillip
Phillip
07-02-2010, 06:34 AM
deValcourt Wrote:Marc, It's paint, those late aluminium one were painted on factory instead enamelling.
This one has features that look very much like the one posted by RichieC on page 7. I assume this is wartime? It has the wavy line through the bottom of the flag, so not plain but certainly not a fringe. Is there a date to these?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|