09-02-2012, 01:29 PM (This post was last modified: 09-02-2012, 02:04 PM by medals73.)
In an effort to breathe some life into a long-moribund thread, sub forum and . . .
. . . a tentative overview:
THE ORDER OF MILITARY VALOR Ca.[I] 1926-31. [/I]Battushig A 21.
1st award (small star, 3 maker’s marks)
Type 1 (no s/n)
Type 2 (serial numbered, No. _) - Low = ??/High = 18 2nd award (Arabic number “2” at bottom) - not seen, does it exist? 3rd award (Arabic number “3” at bottom) - not seen, does it exist? 4th award (Arabic number “4” at bottom) - not seen, does it exist?
Sorry, I can't show you one. I really am sorry about that. (Urnukh shows some nice images.)
ORDER OF THE RED BANNER OF MILITARY VALOUR
1941-46; order for 1-3000 in July 1941 for first batch and later batches through 1944. Battushig A 22.1-22.4.
1st award
Type 1.1 (МОНЕТНЫЙ ДВОР mintmark; 3 rivets) - Low = 4/High = 212
Type 1.2.1 (МОНЕТНЫЙ ДВОР mintmark; 4 rivets; SN at 6 o'clock near bottom) - Low = 44/High = 2401
Type 1.2.2 (МОНЕТНЫЙ ДВОР mintmark; 4 rivets; SN engraved directly below screwpost) - Low = 1007/High = 2581
2nd award - Low = 12/High = 56
3rd award - Low = 9/High = 32
4th award (МОНЕТНЫЙ ДВОР mintmark; SN at 6 o'clock near bottom; 4 rivets) - Low = 4/High = 150
I suspect many of these higher numbered awards, especially the "2", "3", and "4" awards, are unissued bank escapees.
Shown is a first award type 1.2.1 and the award (two of them) in wear.
01-03-2014, 11:18 PM (This post was last modified: 09-01-2014, 11:37 AM by CtahhR.)
Greetings All,
Has anyone seen a fake type 3 Order of the Red Banner of Combat Valor?
Cheers,
Will
I am not sure if anybody noticed this on eba$, but a certain seller bought ORBCV #1955 from Alexei and is now trying to flip it for over $400. I find that disappointing.
Pravda Wrote:I am not sure if anybody noticed this on eba$, but a certain seller bought ORBCV #1955 from Alexei and is now trying to flip it for over $400. I find that disappointing.
Was that the cheap one he had for sale for quite some time? I think i pointed the good deal out in another thread, it may have given somebody a "good" idea...