I haven't been here for a while, and I remember doing a side-by-side comparison of disassembled badges, but in summary:
The arms of red enamel star are off (top ray is too tall, left and right arms shouldn't extend out to or beyond the edge of the badge), the sunburst rays are uneven and count 7 instead of 5, the details in the "gerb" are off (the star is too small, the hammer and sickle are too large, the edges are sharp instead of rounded), the metal borders and edges are rough, and the badge is generally "flat" (the pieces are thinner and lack the contouring that adds depth and a rounded look). Gives an overall impression of "cheap".
The poor quality and widespread availability of this type of badge, ranging from higher military training college to the highest military academy (Voroshilov), makes me think it's a common counterfeit - good for a space filler. That's just my opinion.
The arms of red enamel star are off (top ray is too tall, left and right arms shouldn't extend out to or beyond the edge of the badge), the sunburst rays are uneven and count 7 instead of 5, the details in the "gerb" are off (the star is too small, the hammer and sickle are too large, the edges are sharp instead of rounded), the metal borders and edges are rough, and the badge is generally "flat" (the pieces are thinner and lack the contouring that adds depth and a rounded look). Gives an overall impression of "cheap".
The poor quality and widespread availability of this type of badge, ranging from higher military training college to the highest military academy (Voroshilov), makes me think it's a common counterfeit - good for a space filler. That's just my opinion.
